Photo: www.wikipedia.org
Aliyev claims that the Armenian state was established on historically Azeri lands.
Since early this year Azeri authorities have started shifting their focus in Armenian-Azeri relations from Karabakh to the historic past of Armenia’s capital Yerevan.
No doubt, the issue of Nagorno Karabakh continues holding top positions in the dispute, however, one can’t help noticing the increasing tendency of talks in Baku now claiming that the Armenian capital “belongs to Azerbaijan”.
In February, the ruling Yeni Azerbaijan political party presented a book titled “Irevan khanate” which “proved” that Yerevan belongs to Azerbaijan.
Deputy chairman of the party Ali Ahmedov stressed during the presentation that “the book contains valid proofs of Azerbaijani president Ilham Aliyev’s statement that the capital of Armenia Yerevan is an Azeri land; it is also a response to his appeal not to forget about temporarily lost Azeri lands” (as reported by Azeri news agency Day.az).
Following this, in April, other Azeri news agencies published Aliyev’s statement.
“Armenians have a state, however, that state was established on historically Azeri lands. It is common knowledge. Immediately after proclaiming its independence in 1918 the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan made a decision to give Irevan to Armenia as their capital,” Open.Az cites the president.
Statements such as this cannot be accidental. Azerbaijan’s purpose of doing so is to demonstrate to the international community the futility of any effort aimed at granting independence to Nagorno Karabakh.
“The artificial shift of stresses is aimed at demonstrating to the world that Baku can somehow tolerate Armenia’s existence even if on Azeri lands, with a historically Azeri city as its capital, however it has no intentions of reconciling to Nagorno Karabakh’s independence,” says political analyst Garegin Gabriyelyan. “That’s the reason why it keeps showing readiness to reclaim Karabakh at any cost.”
The unexpected replication of such statements by Azeri ambassadors testifies the approbation of a new approach to the Karabakh issue. On May 9 Azerbaijan’s ambassador to Russia, composer Polad Bulbuloglu made bellicose statements.
And on May 13, Mikail Rahimov, chairman of the Supreme Majlis of the United People’s Front Party of Azerbaijan, stated that “the world community has to pressure Armenia to force that aggressor-state to return the occupied lands to Azerbaijan. And if that doesn’t happen in the nearest future, the Karabakh issue will be solved by means of a war”.
No less than thirty times within this year only has the Azeri president officially stated about the possibility of resuming hostilities and a few times about “Irivan and Zangezur belonging to Azerbaijan”.
These tactical alterations related to the settlement of the Karabakh issue taken up by Azerbaijan did not pass unnoticed by the Armenian side, which, in its turn, made a number of principally new statements.
For the first time in the past 16 years NKR representative have stated that the war Baku so frequently speaks about is, actually, in Armenia’s interests.
NKR Defense Minister, Lieutenant General Movses Hakobyan stated that “resumption of the war is not in Azerbaijan’s interests and is, on the contrary, favorable for us, because we can easily carry out the task we have set. I think, in that case we will once and for all solve the Karabakh-Azerbaijan conflict. ”
Never before has that thought been officially voiced, and it is quite possible, that new statements from the Armenian side will follow soon.
It seems we will hear some other new statements in the nearest future as well.
English
Հայերեն
back to top 
Readers' comments
Read commented Article
Post a comment
Read all 52 comments
Comments are welcomed and encouraged. However, comments not pertaining to the topic or containing slander or offensive language will be deleted. You have to be registered to be able leave your comment. Sign in or Register now for free.